Telescopes form images of infinity-foused objects and collimators project objects to infinity. Sounds simple, is simple. Except when it comes to distortions. Telescopes and collimators create the strangest “distortions” (like keystoning), that really are projections.

How Telescopes Form Images

A telescopes with focal length f takes an infinity-focused object of field angle \theta and creates an image with height h, like this:

No Image Found

In the simplest case, the telescope is an f-theta lens and linearly translates field angles \theta to image heights h dictated by the relation

(1)   \begin{equation*} 	h = f \cdot \theta. \end{equation*}

They key takeway of such an f-theta lens is that its angular magnification is identical to its focal length and is constant over the entire field of view, like this:

(2)   \begin{equation*} 	f = \frac{h}{\theta}. \end{equation*}

For the sake of argument, let’s assume a focal length f = 100\,\mathrm{mm} and thus an angular magnification of 100\,\mathrm{mm} / \mathrm{rad}, or 1.74\,\mathrm{mm}/ \mathrm{{}^{\circ}}.

The whole selling point of such f-theta optics is that it is distortion free. It’s angular magnification is constant over the entire field. However, when one images a perfect rectangular field of view, say, 100 ° x 80 °, using this distortion-free telescope, then the image looks anything but free of distortion. It looks like this:

No Image Found

The image looks barrel distorted. And in practice, it is often treated like a barrel distortion and approximately “distortion-corrected” with various dot charts, line charts or similar patterns. Such efforts tend to be more-or-less succesful, but if anything, they are misguided.

The catch, of course, that this seeming barrel distortion is not a distortion. It is a map projection of angular space (that of the field) onto Euclidean space (that of the image). And angular space and Euclidean space follow different metrics. In Euclidean space, a rectangular object is described by its width x, its height y and its diagonal z follows the Euclidean norm

(3)   \begin{equation*} 	z^2 = x^2 + y^2. \end{equation*}

Angular space, however, works differently. A rectangular object of width \theta_x and height \theta_y has a diagonal \theta_z described by

(4)   \begin{equation*} 	\tan^2 \theta_z = \tan^2 \theta_x + \tan^2 \theta_y. \end{equation*}

It is this difference of those norms that causes the seeming distortion in image space. It is a projection at work, not a distortion ruining an otherwise perfect image.

A similar projection-effect can be observed in the counterpart of the telescopes, the collimators.

How Collimators Focus To Infinity

A collimator is really just a telescope in reverse. Instead of taking an infinity-focused object and focusing it to an image, it takes some object and collimates it to infinity. Often, telescopes and collimators are optically perfectly identical; collimators just have some object in the place where the telescopes have sensors. A collimator looks like this:

No Image Found

For an f-theta lens, a collimator of focal length f projects an object of height h to a field angle \theta described by

(5)   \begin{equation*} 	\theta = \frac{h}{f}. \end{equation*}

Just like with telescopes, the Euclidean space to angular space projection rules apply. So, to crate a perfectly rectangular field, the object has to take this projection into account. If it fails to do so, then the field will not be rectangular, it will look like this:

No Image Found

Combining Telescope & Collimator

The takeaway is that one can get perfectly fooled by the Euclidean-angular space projection. If one uses a telescopes to verify the quality of the field created by some collimator, then seeing a non-distorted image is precisely the image one does not wish to see. It must appear barrel distorted for the field to be rectangular. This image illustrates this seeming paradox:

No Image Found

Keystoning

The Euclidean-angular projection becomes perhaps most noticeable when the object is not perfectly aligned to the collimator optical axis and the telescope is slightly titled to make up for this slight misalignment. Then the projection will cause an effect reminiscent of keystoning found in ceiling-mounted projectors:

No Image Found

Just like with ceiling-mounted projectors, the presence of keystoning is a tell-tale sign of misalignment. Eliminating it is a way to properly align a telescope / projector pair.

Keystoning is a direct consequence of the Euclidean-angular projection. Without taking the Euclidean-angular projection into account, keystoning cannot be understood and will appear as some odd unexplained distortion.

Categories: Optics

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Huchma

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading